Week in Review – January 20 -24, 2014

 

Option to Profit Week in Review
January 20 – 24, 2014
 
NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED
7 / 7 1 2 2 / 0 7 / 0 0

    

Weekly Up to Date Performance

January 20 – 24, 2014

New purchases beat the time adjusted S&P 500 this week by 0.8% and surpassed the unadjusted index by 1.0% during a week that saw the largest loss in the S&P 500 in over 18 months. They did so, however, while being at a net loss for the week themselves.

The market showed a large adjusted loss for the week of 2.4% and unadjusted loss of 2.6% for the week, while new positions fell  1.6%.

For 21 positions positions closed in 2014, performance exceeded that of the S&P 500 by 1.2%. They were up 3.7% out-performing the market by 50.0%, a difference that I don’t expect to continue to be sustained.. 

I was right about something last week.

After the kind of week we just had it was a good thing that it lasted for only 4 trading days. It may be too bad that next week is a full trading week, especially since it will be a very busy week for earnings and as we’ve seen from this past week earnings finally matter.

But even with some decent earnings reported after Thursday’s close and before Friday’s open, there is a tone creeping into the market that is slowly, but not overly dramatically, being very cautious and being responsive to news overseas.

It has been a while since we really concerned ourselves much with what was going on in the rest of the world, other than an occasional pause to consider Chinese economic news reports which always seemed to come in right where projected.

For starters, the latest news from China wasn’t encouraging and increasingly more and more of our stock market is tethered to the Chinese economy. Putting on a cynical hat, we used to like it much better when we thought that Chinese economic data couldn’t be trusted, as opposed to when they may actually be telling the truth.

That’s something that we may not be able to handle.

It used to be that if the US sneezed, the rest of the world caught a cold. Now we’re all in close contact and no one really has immunity, especially when someone the size of China is doing the sneezing. 

 A constellation and convergence of news from China of slowing industrial growth and currency worries in Turkey, credit worries in Argentina and Brazil have placed a lot of pressure on a market that was beginning to shift to an emphasis on fundamentals at a time when the fundamentals weren’t so great.

Things also moved more quickly than we’ve been accustomed too lately. The deteriorations were swift.

News that a company like WW Grainger had disappointing earnings brings into question the strength of any economic recovery, much in the same way as when Fastenal disappoints. Coupled with almost universally horrible retail statistics and it will be interesting to see what the next move
by the Federal Reserve will be, under its new leader, and then how that will be interpreted by the markets.

I felt happy to see the week end and to be able to escape with a handful of assignments and even a rollover. Plunging Fridays are my least favorite kind of days, unless everything I owned was about to be assigned otherwise. My expectations, even this morning was for more assignments and more rollovers, but the market never gave that a chance.

Looking forward, with less cash in hand as I would like to start the week I’m still not fully bowled over by some lower prices. I do see some volatility sneaking into some forward week premiums which indicates an expectation that the decline will continue.

During a period of decline there is sometimes opportunity to take advantage of weakness in existing positions by selling calls even if the strike price represents a loss, if assigned. The reason that becomes appealing is that as volatility increases, so do the premiums and you may be able to find an appealing premium that is a strike price or two out of the money.

The key, however, is to not let that assignment happen, unless a tax loss is a competing objective. Some may have noticed that as personal trades the past three weeks that is what I had done with shares of Anadarko, as its premium was moving higher. With today’s rollover the strike price has crept up with each sale, going from $82.5 to $83 and now to $84 while collecting net premiums of $1.04, subject to the need to trade again next Friday.

In such cases, if assignment looks likely, the call contract is bought back, sometimes at a loss. That looked like it might have been a possibility with Anadarko shares on Wednesday, as it went higher on word of David Einhorn taking a position.

But the anticipation is that assignment won’t happen and instead, while there is systemic weakness you hope to add some additional income stream to your positions. Essentially  you are adding reward when you believe the additional risk, that is losing the position at a price lower than your purchase, is tolerable.

While this is entirely premature and would be an over-statement, that is the kind of trading that was very instrumental in dealing with the declines of 2008 and 2009. Doing so is sometimes a little more stressful than a straightforward trade, but can really feel very rewarding when successfully managed.

I’ve often said that the best times are when the market is either non-committal or going lower. The use of a more aggressive trading strategy with existing positions is one way to make it so.

Get ready and keep your cash reserves safe, but at hand.

 

 

 

 

 

     

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as as in the summary.below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  AIG, C, COP, CREE (puts), FAST, INTC, MOS,

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  CREE

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle: LOW

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  CSCO (2/7)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO:  CPB

Put contracts sold and still open: none

Put contracts expired: nonr

Put contract rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  CHK

Calls Expired: HFC, LULU, MOS, MRO, WAG, WLT

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions:  none

 

 

.

 

 



For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, APC, CLF, DRI, FCX,  GPS, HFC, LB, JCP, LULU, MCP, MOS,  MRO, NEM, PBR, PM, RIG, TGT, WAG, WFM, WLT (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week in Review – January 20 – 24, 2014

 

Option to Profit Week in Review
January 20 – 24, 2014
 
NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED
7 / 7 1 2 2 / 0 7 / 0 0

    

Weekly Up to Date Performance

January 20 – 24, 2014

New purchases beat the time adjusted S&P 500 this week by 0.8% and surpassed the unadjusted index by 1.0% during a week that saw the largest loss in the S&P 500 in over 18 months. They did so, however, while being at a net loss for the week themselves.

The market showed a large adjusted loss for the week of 2.4% and unadjusted loss of 2.6% for the week, while new positions fell  1.6%.

For 21 positions positions closed in 2014, performance exceeded that of the S&P 500 by 1.2%. They were up 3.7% out-performing the market by 50.0%, a difference that I don’t expect to continue to be sustained.. 

I was right about something last week.

After the kind of week we just had it was a good thing that it lasted for only 4 trading days. It may be too bad that next week is a full trading week, especially since it will be a very busy week for earnings and as we’ve seen from this past week earnings finally matter.

But even with some decent earnings reported after Thursday’s close and before Friday’s open, there is a tone creeping into the market that is slowly, but not overly dramatically, being very cautious and being responsive to news overseas.

It has been a while since we really concerned ourselves much with what was going on in the rest of the world, other than an occasional pause to consider Chinese economic news reports which always seemed to come in right where projected.

For starters, the latest news from China wasn’t encouraging and increasingly more and more of our stock market is tethered to the Chinese economy. Putting on a cynical hat, we used to like it much better when we thought that Chinese economic data couldn’t be trusted, as opposed to when they may actually be telling the truth.

That’s something that we may not be able to handle.

It used to be that if the US sneezed, the rest of the world caught a cold. Now we’re all in close contact and no one really has immunity, especially when someone the size of China is doing the sneezing. 

 A constellation and convergence of news from China of slowing industrial growth and currency worries in Turkey, credit worries in Argentina and Brazil have placed a lot of pressure on a market that was beginning to shift to an emphasis on fundamentals at a time when the fundamentals weren’t so great.

Things also moved more quickly than we’ve been accustomed too lately. The deteriorations were swift.

News that a company like WW Grainger had disappointing earnings brings into question the strength of any economic recovery, much in the same way as when Fastenal disappoints. Coupled with almost universally horrible retail statistics and it will be interesting to see what the next move
by the Federal Reserve will be, under its new leader, and then how that will be interpreted by the markets.

I felt happy to see the week end and to be able to escape with a handful of assignments and even a rollover. Plunging Fridays are my least favorite kind of days, unless everything I owned was about to be assigned otherwise. My expectations, even this morning was for more assignments and more rollovers, but the market never gave that a chance.

Looking forward, with less cash in hand as I would like to start the week I’m still not fully bowled over by some lower prices. I do see some volatility sneaking into some forward week premiums which indicates an expectation that the decline will continue.

During a period of decline there is sometimes opportunity to take advantage of weakness in existing positions by selling calls even if the strike price represents a loss, if assigned. The reason that becomes appealing is that as volatility increases, so do the premiums and you may be able to find an appealing premium that is a strike price or two out of the money.

The key, however, is to not let that assignment happen, unless a tax loss is a competing objective. Some may have noticed that as personal trades the past three weeks that is what I had done with shares of Anadarko, as its premium was moving higher. With today’s rollover the strike price has crept up with each sale, going from $82.5 to $83 and now to $84 while collecting net premiums of $1.04, subject to the need to trade again next Friday.

In such cases, if assignment looks likely, the call contract is bought back, sometimes at a loss. That looked like it might have been a possibility with Anadarko shares on Wednesday, as it went higher on word of David Einhorn taking a position.

But the anticipation is that assignment won’t happen and instead, while there is systemic weakness you hope to add some additional income stream to your positions. Essentially  you are adding reward when you believe the additional risk, that is losing the position at a price lower than your purchase, is tolerable.

While this is entirely premature and would be an over-statement, that is the kind of trading that was very instrumental in dealing with the declines of 2008 and 2009. Doing so is sometimes a little more stressful than a straightforward trade, but can really feel very rewarding when successfully managed.

I’ve often said that the best times are when the market is either non-committal or going lower. The use of a more aggressive trading strategy with existing positions is one way to make it so.

Get ready and keep your cash reserves safe, but at hand.

 

 

 

 

 

     

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as as in the summary.below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  AIG, C, COP, CREE (puts), FAST, INTC, MOS,

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  CREE

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle: LOW

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  CSCO (2/7)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO:  CPB

Put contracts sold and still open: none

Put contracts expired: nonr

Put contract rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  CHK

Calls Expired: HFC, LULU, MOS, MRO, WAG, WLT

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions:  none

 

 

.

 

 



For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, APC, CLF, DRI, FCX,  GPS, HFC, LB, JCP, LULU, MCP, MOS,  MRO, NEM, PBR, PM, RIG, TGT, WAG, WFM, WLT (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Daily Market Update – January 24, 2014

 

  

(see all trades this option cycle)

 

Daily Market Update – January 24, 2014 (9:00 AM)

The Weekend Update will be posted by 7 PM (EST) tonight and the Week in Review will be posted by noon on Sunday:

 

Today’s possible outcomes, include:

Assignment:  CHK, LLY

Rollover:  CSCO, HFC, LOW, MOS, MRO

Expiration:  LULU, WAG, WLT

 

Trades, if any, will be attempted to be made before 3:30 PM (EST), where possible.

 

 

  

 

 

   

 Access prior Daily Market Updates by clicking here

 OTP Sector Distribution* as of January 23, 2014

 * Assumes equal number of shares in positions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posting of trades is not a recommendation to execute trades

 

Monday through Thursday? See “Daily Market Update” with first edition published by 12 Noon and Closing Update published by 4:30 PM

Friday? See Week in Review for summary statistics and performance

Sunday? See Weekend Update for potential stock choices for coming week

Any day? See Performance for open and closed positions

Subscribers may see  ROI statistics  on all new, existing and closed positions on a daily updated basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See all Trade Alerts for this monthly option cycle

  
 

   

Weekly Prospects (January 20 – 24, 2014)

 

 

 

 

 

MONDAY: Markets closed. Go shopping and help support April retail earnings.

TUESDAY:    Earnings get going this week for real and Dow Chemical is put into play. Oh, those activists

WEDNESDAY:  IBM in focus today as earnings disappoint again. As yesterday, broad market may outperform DJIA with IBM and United Technologies may weigh on Dow.

THURSDAY:   Where would the market be without Carl Icahn? Today it’s eBay, more Apple and Netflix up 17% on earnings.

FRIDAY: On the way to another successive weak Friday to close another weak week

                                                                                                                                                  

” *SNEAK PEEK AT NEXT WEEK” APPEARS ON FRIDAYS *

Sneak Peek

* Sneak Peek selections subject to change before final Sunday posting

 

  

Daily Market Update – January 23, 2014 (Close)

 

  

(see all trades this option cycle)

 

Daily Market Update – January 23, 2014 (Close)

What a day, but at least it was another good day to be Carl Icahn.

Oh, to be Carl Icahn.

While the market was getting everyone’s attention by being down more than 200 points at its lowest, just 30 minutes before the closing bell, Carl Icahn was sitting pretty.

eBay, the newest in the Icahn family, as we would find out later, was widely expected to have a throw away earnings report this quarter and analysts were expecting shares to fall 5% or more.

This was a company that barely two months ago was widely derided, yet like Caterpillar, which equally caught slings from everyone, just kept moving higher, at a time when the overall market was beginning to lose its way.

But I also thought that eBay would likely see shares fall at earnings and welcomed the idea, because that would bring it back to rollover price territory and eBay has been a great stock for that kind of play.

Instead, eBay took the opportunity to time the announcement of Carl Icahn having picked up a stake in the company and wanting two board seats for his less than 1% share of ownership.

Shares, of course, responded as they usually do when Icahn gets involved and went wildly higher in the after market, although settling down by the pre-open market this morning, yet heading in a direction opposite that of the broad market, which was looking to open trading with a triple digit loss.

Of course, he also owns Apple and has added another billion or so, timed perfectly with shares moving higher. Apple happens to report earnings next week.

Then there’s Netflix. Despite having sold of portion of his shares to take immense profits a few months ago, Icahn still owns about 4% of a company that just reported earnings and saw its shares climb 17% in the pre-open.

And then there’s the rest of us. The people who are unable to move a stocks price by virtue of a Tweet, although I must say I still get a thrill when I see an option sale executed and my trade represents 100% of the day’s volume at that moment in time.

For just that moment in time, I am the market.

Still, not quite Carl Icahn territory.

What is fascinating is that there is reportedly so much cash on the sidelines.

Carl Icahn has it. Companies have record amounts of cash even after record buybacks and reportedly there is still lots of money wallowing away in bonds or money markets.

At the moment it seems as if only investor activists and those share buybacks are able to maintain the market at these levels.. Whether its Dan Loeb, David Einhorn or Carl Icahn, the reality is that that are relatively few people that can create substantive movements in shares and even they have limited resources.

At the moment, Carl Icahn is involved in as many companies as can be imagined. It’s hard to envision him doing much more without dropping some other positions. Of course, a victory as with Netflix opens up lots of other opportunities and his continuing stake there could easily fuel more activity elsewhere.

Yet these high profile stock stories are bound to have a natural limit, just as share buybacks have their limits and are actually a poor use of money when shares are already so high, as has been the practice of companies such as Cisco and IBM.

So I keep asking myself what will propel the market forward and I keep having a difficult time coming up with an answer. But somehow the market has kept right on going, even when the fundamentals haven’t warranted the rise.

What is somewhat telling, and may confirm the role of Quantitative Easing, is that the market hasn’t been the same since the initiation of the taper has been announced.

The next challenge may simply be the announcement of an increase in the taper, thereby reducing the amount that the Federal Reserve introduces into the market.

At that point we may get back to the quandary of whether good news is bad and bad news is good.

In the meantime, earnings are relatively straightforward and guidance even more so.

Today, it was obvious that bad news was bad news. It takes more than Netflix to be a reflection of an economy that’s turning around..

  

 

 

   

 Access prior Daily Market Updates by clicking here

 OTP Sector Distribution* as of January 23, 2014

 * Assumes equal number of shares in positions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posting of trades is not a recommendation to execute trades

 

Monday through Thursday? See “Daily Market Update” with first edition published by 12 Noon and Closing Update published by 4:30 PM

Friday? See Week in Review for summary statistics and performance

Sunday? See Weekend Update for potential stock choices for coming week

Any day? See Performance for open and closed positions

Subscribers may see  ROI statistics  on all new, existing and closed positions on a daily updated basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See all Trade Alerts for this monthly option cycle

  
 

   

Daily Market Update – January 23, 2014

 

  

(see all trades this option cycle)

 

Daily Market Update – January 23, 2014 (9:30 AM)

Oh, to be Carl Icahn.

eBay, was widely expected to have a throw away earnings report this quarter and analysts were expecting shares to fall 5% or so.

This was a company that barely two months ago was widely derided, yet like Caterpillar, which equally caught slings from everyone, just kept moving higher, at a time when the overall market was beginning to lose its way.

But I also thought that eBay would likely see shares fall at earnings and welcomed the idea, because that would bring it back to rollover price territory and eBay has been a great stock for that kind of play.

Instead, eBay took the opportunity to time the announcement of Carl Icahn having picked up a stake in the company and wanting two board seats for his less than 1% share of ownership.

Shares, of course, responded as they usually do when Icahn gets involved and went wildly higher in the after market, although settling down by the pre-open market this morning, yet heading in a direction opposite that of the broad market, which was looking to open trading with a triple digit loss.

Of course, he also owns Apple and has added another billion or so, timed perfectly with shares moving higher. Apple happens to report earnings next week.

Then there’s Netflix. Despite having sold of portion of his shares to take immense profits a few months ago, Icahn still owns about 4% of a company that just reported earnings and saw its shares climb 17% in the pre-open.

And then there’s the rest of us. The people who are unable to move a stocks price by virtue of a Tweet, although I must say I still get a thrill when I see an option sale executed and my trade represents 100% of the day’s volume at that moment in time.

For just that moment in time, I am the market.

Still, not quite Carl Icahn territory.

What is fascinating is that there is reportedly so much cash on the sidelines.

Carl Icahn has it. Companies have record amounts of cash even after record buybacks and reportedly there is still lots of money wallowing away in bonds or money markets.

At the moment it seems as if only investor activists and those share buybacks are able to maintain the market at these levels.. Whether its Dan Loeb, David Einhorn or Carl Icahn, the reality is that that are relatively few people that can create substantive movements in shares and even they have limited resources.

At the moment, Carl Icahn is involved in as many companies as can be imagined. It’s hard to envision him doing much more without dropping some other positions. Of course, a victory as with Netflix opens up lots of other opportunities and his continuing stake there could easily fuel more activity elsewhere.

Yet these high profile stock stories are bound to have a natural limit, just as share buybacks have their limits and are actually a poor use of money when shares are already so high, as has been the practice of companies such as Cisco and IBM.

So I keep asking myself what will propel the market forward and I keep having a difficult time coming up with an answer. But somehow the market has kept right on going, even when the fundamentals haven’t warranted the rise.

What is somewhat telling, and may confirm the role of Quantitative Easing, is that the market hasn’t been the same since the initiation of the taper has been announced.

The next challenge may simply be the announcement of an i
ncrease in the taper, thereby reducing the amount that the Federal Reserve introduces into the market.

At that point we may get back to the quandary of whether good news is bad and bad news is good.

In the meantime, earnings are relatively straightforward and guidance even moreso.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 Access prior Daily Market Updates by clicking here

 OTP Sector Distribution* as of January 22, 2014

 * Assumes equal number of shares in positions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posting of trades is not a recommendation to execute trades

 

Monday through Thursday? See “Daily Market Update” with first edition published by 12 Noon and Closing Update published by 4:30 PM

Friday? See Week in Review for summary statistics and performance

Sunday? See Weekend Update for potential stock choices for coming week

Any day? See Performance for open and closed positions

Subscribers may see  ROI statistics  on all new, existing and closed positions on a daily updated basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See all Trade Alerts for this monthly option cycle

  
 

   

Daily Market Update – January 22, 2014 Close

 

  

(see all trades this option cycle)

 

Daily Market Update – January 22, 2014 (Close)

Earnings continue this morning and most of the early talk was about once invincible IBM, which will open weighing heavily on the DJIA.

While there’s still a lot of earnings to go, following the script set by the financials over the past few earnings seasons, the remaining sectors have been lagging, even when expectations are lowered.

One factor mentioned this morning was the cautious mood expressed by those reporting good earnings.

Certainly, when you hear that forward earnings may be impacted by a variety of factors even good last quarter numbers become meaningless. But if there seems to be agreement that the near term future will be challenging, what becomes the basis for sending the market higher? Where is the economic growth?

So far January 2014 seems to be taking that issue much more seriously than at any point in 2013.

This morning started in a very interesting way and saw some wild gyrations in a couple of stocks that I was following for earnings. In both cases I decided yesterday that the reward for making the trades prior to earnings didn’t offset the perceived risk.

But this morning after both Coach and Cree released earnings I was ready to make some short term trades, albeit with the sale of puts, rather than covered calls.

In one case, I was able to sell $48 puts on Coach, but before I could even get the Trading Alert sent, shares reversed direction and the premium was almost cut in half.

Then I did get a Trading Alert sent on shares of Cree. In that case, it reversed direction almost instantaneously with having sent the alert.

I always like looking at the 1 minute charts to see the really wild moves and wonder what causes such pronounced and sudden shifts. In some cases it’s panic and in other cases it’s just fear of missing out (FOMO). I can’t really understand what other factors might be involved, especially when there is significant volume.

For example, take a look at the 1 minute charts of both Anadarko and British Petroleum today at 10:07 AM.

What they had in common was buying from those with uncontrollable FOMO, as news came out that David Einhorn had established large positions in both. For the casual investor that should suggest that a very smart person believes that litigation liabilities for both of those companies have been defined and as such, are no longer real liabilities.

At the time of the Cree Trading Alert, at 9:40 AM, options were trading at 0.89. By 9:42 AM it was down to $0.57, then a minute later $0.40 and then another minute later was down to $0.34.

The Coach movement was actually more dramatic, because for 2 minutes it was trading hands at about $1.70 and then went straight to $0.60 and then in another 2 minutes was at $0.37.

In the case of Coach, it has almost a 2 year history of disappointing on earnings and then simply recovering. Although it’s easy to be wrong, I didn’t expect shares to go much lower than where the pre-open trading had it. I was surprised, however, to see how quickly it had recaptured much of the early loss.

Cree, on the other hand started with a nice gain after yesterday evenings earnings release, but saw it pared a little in the pre-market.

It opened nicely higher, but then gave up much of the gain. At that point I thought it was a good time to sell puts expiring in just 3 days. Apparently at about the same time someone, possibly a single buyer, thought it was a good idea picking up shares, that maybe they thought were bargain priced. The option volume also jumped very quickly, normally suggesting that money was following other people’s money.

However, in this case, much of that option volume was in this Friday’s expiration.

That suggests that the very same people who bought shares also bought the options, because there’s otherwise too much of a risk of buying blindly options that expire in less than 3 days.

Not my problem, I suppose.

Unfortunately.

What I do know, however, is that while we hear and see significant spikes in option volume on short term contracts, most often they end up expiring worthless or are rolled over by the buyer, who adjusts his thesis by increasing the time frame.

Those are the kind of people that I like selling my options to.

 

 

 

 

   

 Access prior Daily Market Updates by clicking here

 OTP Sector Distribution* as of January 22, 2014

 * Assumes equal number of shares in positions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posting of trades is not a recommendation to execute trades

 

Monday through Thursday? See “Daily Market Update” with first edition published by 12 Noon and Closing Update published by 4:30 PM

Friday? See Week in Review for summary statistics and performance

Sunday? See Weekend Update for potential stock choices for coming week

Any day? See Performance for open and closed positions

Subscribers may see  ROI statistics  on all new, existing and closed positions on a daily updated basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 < /p>

 

See all Trade Alerts for this monthly option cycle

  
 

   

Daily Market Update

 

  

(see all trades this option cycle)

 

Daily Market Update – January 22, 2014 (10:45 AM)

Earnings continue this morning and most of the early talk was about once invincible IBM, which will open weighing heavily on the DJIA.

While there’s still a lot of earnings to go, following the script set by the financials over the past few earnings seasons, the remaining sectors have been lagging, even when expectations are lowered.

One factor mentioned this morning was the cautious mood expressed by those reporting good earnings.

Certainly, when you hear that forward earnings may be impacted by a variety of factors even good last quarter numbers become meaningless. But if there seems to be agreement that the near term future will be challenging, what becomes the basis for sending the market higher? Where is the economic growth?

So far January 2014 seems to be taking that issue much more seriously than at any point in 2013.

This morning started in a very interesting way and saw some wild gyrations in a couple of stocks that I was following for earnings. In both cases I decided yesterday that the reward for making the trades prior to earnings didn’t offset the perceived risk.

But this morning after both Coach and Cree released earnings I was ready to make some short term trades, albeit with the sale of puts, rather than covered calls.

In one case, I was able to sell $48 puts on Coach, but before I could even get the Trading Alert sent, shares reversed direction and the premium was almost cut in half.

Then I did get a Trading Alert sent on shares of Cree. In that case, it reversed direction almost instantaneously with having sent the alert.

I always like looking at the 1 minute charts to see the really wild moves and wonder what causes such pronounced and sudden shifts. In some cases it’s panic and in other cases it’s just fear of missing out. I can’t really understand what other factors might be involved, especially when there is significant volume.

AT the time of the Cree Trading Alert, at 9:40 AM, options were trading at 0.89. By 9:42 AM it was down to $0.57, then a minute later $0.40 and then another minute later was down to $0.34.

The Coach movement was actually more dramatic, because for 2 minutes it was trading hands at about $1.70 and then went straight to $0.60 and then in another 2 minutes was at $0.37.

In the case of Coach, it has almost a 2 year history of disappointing on earnings and then simply recovering. Although it’s easy to be wrong, I didn’t expect shares to go much lower than where the pre-open trading had it. I was surprised, however, to see how quickly it had recaptured much of the early loss.

Cree, on the other hand started with a nice gain after yesterday evenings earnings release, but saw it pared a little in the pre-market.

It opened nicely higher, but then gave up much of the gain. At that point I thought it was a good time to sell puts expiring in just 3 days. Apparently at about the same time someone, possibly a single buyer, thought it was a good idea picking up shares, that maybe they thought were bargain priced. The option volume also jumped very quickly, normally suggesting that money was following other people’s money.

However, in this case, much of that option volume was in this Friday’s expiration.

That suggests that the very same people who bought shares also bought the options, because there’s otherwise too much of a risk of buying blindly options that expire in less than 3 days.

Not my problem, I suppose.

Unfortunately.

What I do know, however, is that while we hear and see significant spikes in option volume on short term contracts, most often they end up expiring worthless or are rolled over by the buyer, who adjusts his thesis by increasing the time frame.

Those are the kind of people that I like selling my options to.

 

 

 

 

   

 Access prior Daily Market Updates by clicking here

 OTP Sector Distribution* as of January 21, 2014

 * Assumes equal number of shares in positions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posting of trades is not a recommendation to execute trades

 

Monday through Thursday? See “Daily Market Update” with first edition published by 12 Noon and Closing Update published by 4:30 PM

Friday? See Week in Review for summary statistics and performance

Sunday? See Weekend Update for potential stock choices for coming week

Any day? See Performance for open and closed positions

Subscribers may see  ROI statistics  on all new, existing and closed positions on a daily updated basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See all Trade Alerts for this monthly option cycle

  
 

   

Daily Market Update – January 21, 2014 (Close)

 

  

(see all trades this option cycle)

 

Daily Market Update – January 21, 2014 (Close)

With everyone of any importance being in Davos for the 2014 Global Economy meeting, it’s a good week to have almost no economic news scheduled to be released.

Instead, it’s a week of photo opportunities in the snow and dealing with the avalanche of earnings, not to be confused with actual avalanches in the Swiss mountain resort of Davos.

Starting the week is unexpected news that activist Dan Loeb is taking a stake in Dow Chemical. He was very successful recently in Yahoo!, probably getting out way too early and then not quite as successful with his interest in Sony.

Dow Chemical was a stock bought 9 times in 2013 and another 7 times in 2012. I was anxious to buy it again, but it suddenly is set to escape its longstanding mediocrity in its trading which is more than a decade long.

While I hate seeing a reliable stock get removed from rotation, this is an important bit of news, based on Dow’s market capitalization. Although Yahoo! is now a $40 billion company, it was far from that when Loeb became involved. Dow Chemical is already a $52 billion company and Loeb’s ownership is “only” about 2% of the market capitalization

That kind of commitment to a company that is closely tied with economic growth and expansion is a vote in that direction. The vote is in the way that counts most; with Loeb’s own money.

While no one has a crystal ball, Loeb’s interest in Dow Chemical is interesting in what many think is the very late stage of a stock market bull run. Clearly, Loeb doesn’t believe that the top is near.

What we don’t know is what Loeb’s time frame is, as he has shown the inclination to move on. The longer his time frame, the less relevance his actions have on how to look at tomorrow or the day after.

Given some of the details surrounding Dow Chemical’s Board of Directors, it appears as if there is almost a year before any board seats could be gained, so in the interim the changes at Dow, if any should be slow and strategic in nature.

That means that even if Dow has escaped its trading orbit and gone to a new level, it may still be attractive even at that higher level, as its option premium is likely to increase and it has a nice dividend.

But that’s a consideration for tomorrow or the day after.

Today the consideration is just how real the pre-market climb is and how much staying power it has. No doubt the Dow Chemical news adds fuel to whatever nascent buying there has been lately.

As it would turn out there was no staying power, but the market recovered most of its early losses. Ib fact, the broad market did much better than the narrow DJIA and was up for the day.

With the start of the February cycle and already having this week’s option expirations populated, as well as some for the following week, the goal will be to continue that diversification, where possible.

At about 40% in cash, I’m again willing to get down to the 25% level, but not too likely to jump in on a strong open for the week and more likely to want to stick to lower volatility names, although some of the earnings trades do look a little tempting.

For now, though, the focus is still on reasonable safety, premiums and dividends while waiting for some sign of direction that has been slow in coming since the start of the New Year.

Unfortunately, today wasn’t the kind of day to easily identify many prospects. With a trade shortened week the premiums were already 20% lower and volatility went down even further today, taking premiums with them.

As much as I wanted to grab some more dividends, I just couldn’t justify those trades today. The same applies to those positions reporting earnings after tod
ay’s closing bell or before trading tomorrow. In those cases, however, the premiums were good, but I don’t like making the trades when those stocks are moving higher.

On the other hand, as some prices did fall today, other potential opportunities may be creating themselves, such as Starbucks, which was downgraded in advance of earnings Thursday afternoon and has already fallen about 7% in the past week.

Tomorrow is another day.

 

   

 Access prior Daily Market Updates by clicking here

 OTP Sector Distribution* as of January 21, 2014

 * Assumes equal number of shares in positions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posting of trades is not a recommendation to execute trades

 

Monday through Thursday? See “Daily Market Update” with first edition published by 12 Noon and Closing Update published by 4:30 PM

Friday? See Week in Review for summary statistics and performance

Sunday? See Weekend Update for potential stock choices for coming week

Any day? See Performance for open and closed positions

Subscribers may see  ROI statistics  on all new, existing and closed positions on a daily updated basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See all Trade Alerts for this monthly option cycle

  
 

   

Is Jeff Bezos Killing Capitalism?

(A version of this article appeared on TheStreet)
 

My guess is that if you asked people to describe the face of the individual most tied to the idea of destroying capitalism you would evoke images of Marx, Lenin or Castro, men of distinctive features and great bluster who made no secret of their disdain.
Ask me and I see a man who is softly spoken, clean shaved, spares the bluster, lacks distinct or memorable features, although possesses a distinctive laugh and has greatly benefited from the system he is destroying. I see Jeff Bezos as the anti-capitalist who is methodically destroying the foundations that allowed the United States to thrive.
First, let’s acknowledge that Amazon (AMZN) is an American success story. Financed by family funds and embracing technology as none had before, it survived an era that many did not and turned a concept into reality that has subsumed retailing, forcing retailers to create online shopping strategies.
Amazon will report its earnings on January 30, 2014. While I don’t invest with items such as P/E, in mind, I know enough that Amazon’s P/E of 1414 puts to rest the derisive comments about it being a non-profit. But I also know that no one believes in the axiom “we make it up in volume” more than Amazon, which had a 0.19% profit margin last year, compared to a sector average of 9.5%. Of 20 national retailers, only four had profit margins lower than Amazon; JC Penney, Sears Holdings, Best Buy and Aeropostale.
And that is precisely the problem. That is how Amazon is killing capitalism in its methodic march to eliminate competition, beginning with the already wounded. As the saying goes, “the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.” Bezos, though, isn’t being irrational, as demonstrated by competitors that are slowly melting into irrelevancy. With size comes power, in this case pricing power, which to a degree has been supported by an asymmetric application of sales tax collection requirements. In essence, indirect government support undermining existing capitalist structure in support of a venture evolving toward a monopolistic or market controlling position.
At a time when consumer discretionary spending doesn’t appear to be consistent with an expanding and improving economy price sensitivity remains an important motivator and Amazon maintains its advantage by aggressive pricing at the expense of margins. With over $70 billion in revenues it trails Wal-Mart, but exceeds the combined revenues of Sears, JC Penney and Kohls, while matching Target’s revenues. The latter two companies have scarce cushion in their profit and operating margins to withstand further erosion by an energized Amazon, ready to continue decreasing its margins, as it has done over the past 3 years.
AMZN Profit Margin (Quarterly) Chart
AMZN Profit Margin (Quarterly) data by YCharts
Don’t get me wrong. I am a capitalist through and through and believe that competition is what drives us forward, while other systems are left to the ash heaps of history along with the dodo. The same fate should befall businesses that simply can’t compete on the basis of that blend of price and quality that appeals to varying segments of the population.
Competing against Amazon, however, is somewhat like the Aztecs being faced with gunpowder propelled projectiles.
Admittedly, I shop Amazon and will probably continue doing so even as it increasingly loses the sales tax advantage it held over brick and mortar retailers. However, it is now that next phase, as that artificial pricing advantage disappears, that Amazon can only do one thing to maintain its position. It has to further reduce its profit margins.
While Bezos may not be acting irrationally, investors may be accused of doing so, particularly in light of margins. Most any other retailing CEO would have been shown the door with performance such as Amazon delivers. However, it’s share price that talks and you can’t argue with a P/E of 1414, except that it’s 1414. The realization that profits and return on equity are important concepts is currently suspended as there is implicit buy-in from investors that the strategy of driving the competition out of business is a sound one in anticipation of even greater share appreciation rewards. Clearly the vision of near monopolistic existence has its perceived reward.
While Amazon may not solely be to blame for the woes at JC Penney (JCP) and Sears (SHLD), it may not be entirely coincidental that JC Penney and Sears profit woes began in earnest at the time that Amazon’s own profit margins began decreasing in 2011. Amazon is undoubtedly a contributor not just to those growing losses, but also to the degradation of the shopping experience as so graphically illustrated in a recent series of articles by Rocco Pendola. When you can no longer compete on the basis of price and are unable to generate sales revenues and cash flows, the only recourse remaining is to cut costs.
Fewer employees, bare shelves and lack of facilities maintenance are the natural next stages. As predictable as the “Five Stages of Grief,” except there may be no end stage healthy resolution in sight.
While Bezos is on a path that endangers capitalism, his continued success may really jeopardize Amazon’s own shareholders whose fortunes are predicated on a model that history has shown can’t be sustained. Eventually, profits and not promises, are the engine that drive companies and their stocks. Sooner or later, cash flow is no substitute for profits.
If you want to see capitalism saved, the answer is a plummeting Amazon share price and subsequent investor pressure to increase profit margins, restoring balance to the retail sector and giving the likes of JC Penney and Sears the ability to dodge those projectiles.